For Christmas I received an intriguing gift from a pal - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and 103.6.222.206 it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was totally written by AI, galgbtqhistoryproject.org with a few easy triggers about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and extremely funny in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of writing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and really verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, considering that pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can buy any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody developing one in anybody's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He hopes to broaden his variety, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human clients.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to produce, wolvesbaneuo.com and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we really indicate human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for creative purposes should be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without approval must be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful however let's develop it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually selected to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to use creators' content on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of happiness," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its finest carrying out markets on the unclear promise of development."

A government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made up until we are definitely confident we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them license their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a national information library including public data from a large range of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of suits against AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became the many downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to read in parts because it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not sure the length of time I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.